PortfoliosLab logo
^NDX vs. ONEQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^NDX and ONEQ is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

^NDX vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ 100 (^NDX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^NDX:

0.59

ONEQ:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

^NDX:

1.01

ONEQ:

1.00

Omega Ratio

^NDX:

1.14

ONEQ:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

^NDX:

0.67

ONEQ:

0.64

Martin Ratio

^NDX:

2.19

ONEQ:

2.10

Ulcer Index

^NDX:

7.03%

ONEQ:

7.34%

Daily Std Dev

^NDX:

25.60%

ONEQ:

26.00%

Max Drawdown

^NDX:

-82.90%

ONEQ:

-55.09%

Current Drawdown

^NDX:

-5.90%

ONEQ:

-7.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NDX achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NDX has outperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 16.65%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively lower 15.17% annualized return.


^NDX

YTD

-0.69%

1M

11.65%

6M

-1.13%

1Y

14.91%

5Y*

18.40%

10Y*

16.65%

ONEQ

YTD

-3.09%

1M

11.58%

6M

-2.97%

1Y

15.17%

5Y*

17.36%

10Y*

15.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^NDX vs. ONEQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^NDX is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^NDX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^NDX is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^NDX is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^NDX is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^NDX is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ONEQ is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^NDX vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ 100 (^NDX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^NDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NDX and ONEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^NDX vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NDX drawdown since its inception was -82.90%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NDX and ONEQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^NDX vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ 100 (^NDX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) have volatilities of 7.55% and 7.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...